Our Editorial Standards

MindJrnl exists to make mental wellness accessible and understandable. We know that misinformation about mental health can cause real harm, which is why we invest heavily in ensuring everything we publish is trustworthy, current, and actionable.

Our editorial team combines clinical expertise with a passion for clear, compassionate communication. We believe that everyone deserves access to reliable wellness information -- presented in language that is easy to understand, without dumbing down the science.

We are committed to editorial independence. Our content recommendations are never influenced by advertisers, sponsors, or commercial partnerships. When we recommend a practice or technique, it is because the evidence supports it -- not because someone paid us to say so.

All health and wellness claims made in MindJrnl content are grounded in scientific evidence. We hold our content to these research standards:

• Peer-reviewed sources: We cite studies published in peer-reviewed journals such as the Journal of Clinical Psychology, Mindfulness, and the American Journal of Psychiatry. We prioritize meta-analyses and systematic reviews when available.
• Established guidelines: We reference clinical practice guidelines from recognized bodies including the American Psychological Association (APA), the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), and the World Health Organization (WHO).
• Recency: We prefer studies published within the last five years. When citing older foundational research, we verify that the findings remain current and have not been contradicted by more recent work.
• Transparency: When evidence is limited, preliminary, or mixed, we say so clearly. We never overstate the certainty of findings or present hypotheses as established facts.
• No medical advice: Our content is educational and informational. We always encourage readers to consult a qualified healthcare professional for personal medical decisions.

Every piece of health-related content goes through a multi-stage review before it reaches our readers. This process is designed to catch errors, verify claims, and ensure that our content is both accurate and helpful.

Stage 1: Editorial Review

Our wellness editor reviews every article for clarity, tone, and readability. Content must be accessible to a general audience while maintaining scientific integrity. We check that all claims are properly sourced and that the article provides genuine value to readers.

Stage 2: Expert Review

A licensed professional reviews all health-related claims. For articles about psychology and mental health, our clinical psychologist Dr. James Miller verifies that claims align with current clinical understanding. For mindfulness and meditation content, our certified mindfulness instructor reviews for accuracy and safety.

Stage 3: Fact-Checking

We independently verify all statistics, study citations, and factual claims. Every hyperlink is checked. Every source is confirmed. If we cannot verify a claim, we remove it or clearly label it as anecdotal.

Stage 4: Ongoing Monitoring

After publication, we monitor for reader feedback and new research that may affect our content. Articles are reviewed at least annually, and more frequently when new evidence emerges in rapidly evolving areas.

Accuracy is our highest priority, but we are human. When we get something wrong, we correct it promptly and transparently.

• Minor corrections: Typos, broken links, and minor factual clarifications are fixed promptly. The article date is updated to reflect the change.
• Significant corrections: Substantive errors in health claims, study citations, or recommendations are corrected immediately. A correction note is added at the top of the article explaining what was changed and why.
• Retractions: In the rare event that an article contains fundamentally flawed information, we retract it and publish an explanation. We notify readers who may have been affected.

If you believe any of our content contains an error, please contact our editorial team. We take every report seriously and typically respond within two business days.